Our Brand-new Deepseek-based AI Says
Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"
Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting
Share this post
No one can predict the future but at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a small but lively 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to answer humanity's most difficult questions.
Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less simple to determine. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at anticipating the future (and have seen some appealing enhancements - research paper inbound). This week we turned its cold, computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.
For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!
Background
Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months back so we have actually constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified area to make its finest forecast possible.
And Now ... The Important Questions
We postured the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its reaction. While we have seen forecast enhancements from our training, use these quotes for prop betting at your own peril.
Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility
Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...
First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been helpful of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her good friends and family to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.
Some fans are excited, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given comments Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.
I think the key points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the odds and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low probability, maybe around 5%, considering all elements.
Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity
No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.
Alright, I'm trying to determine the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and technique.
Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The short article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I likewise require to think of the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense accordingly, which could either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles use it.
Considering that more than five appears like a substantial number but possible offered their confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the possibility that they'll utilize it a number of times, especially if it works early on.
Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program performance?
AI Final Prediction: setiathome.berkeley.edu 65% chance
While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.
From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That seems significant due to the fact that it reveals he's done it previously, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could mean he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.
However, he's likewise associated with a fight with Drake, which might give him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so possibly he bewares about consisting of any questionable songs in the efficiency. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.
Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar might feel compelled to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime program, so there's a risk that such content might be restricted or softened.
On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong moves on big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which may offer him more innovative liberty. Plus, his previous behavior suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.
But I likewise remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the likelihood seems to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.
Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 25% chance
Lets be honest, Andy Reid enjoys cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its forecast? Looks like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.
From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to cause offense and that he actually discovered it funny himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.
Looking at the articles, oke.zone it discusses that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a short article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's an individual who takes pleasure in eating, especially with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.
Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?
AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility
"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and believes anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.
Okay, so I'm trying to determine the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical data that may influence this forecast.
First, I review the short articles supplied. They all discuss the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has come up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a substantial difference.
However, I remember that the outcome of a coin toss is generally thought about random. The slight historic edge for tails could be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, often individuals weigh historic information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I must think about whether this historical predisposition must affect the possibility.
After considering it, I choose that while the historical information shows a slight preference for library.kemu.ac.ke tails, it's not statistically considerable sufficient to move the probability far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the small historical edge exists however doesn't the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.
Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?
AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity
We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably believe the same. BUT, its official now due to the fact that our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!
AI Reasoning:
Okay, so I'm trying to determine the probability that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty major allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of short articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable employ recent video games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.
But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "outrageous." They state there's no proof of organized predisposition. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might indicate there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some fact to it.
Looking at the short articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis doesn't show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have been penalized more given that 2022. That's interesting since if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?
...
So, putting everything together, eet3122salainf.sytes.net the probability that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't eliminate every possibility, however extremely not likely.
Summary
There you have it everybody, is it even worth viewing the game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, at least it can gain from this.