GitLab

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to give it its finest shot. With as much as date news and a little however feisty 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to address mankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain lots of pressing concerns that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be much better at forecasting the future (and have seen some intriguing improvements - term paper incoming). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification model which is actually on the smaller side. (Some price quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months back so we have developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unknown territory to make its best forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We postured the following concerns to our AI and assessed its response. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the essential points from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her loved ones to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, disgaeawiki.info while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and garagesale.es the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the chances and his responses suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low probability, perhaps around 5%, considering all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and complexityzoo.net again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to figure out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it seems like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and classifieds.ocala-news.com method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to perform the relocation. The post discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think of the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or decrease the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a significant number however possible provided their confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the possibility that they'll use it numerous times, particularly if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That appears considerable due to the fact that it shows he's done it before, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That might imply he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's also involved in a fight with Drake, which might give him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation suit from Drake, so maybe he's mindful about consisting of any controversial tunes in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he may still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar may feel compelled to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements throughout the halftime program, so there's a danger that such material may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong relocations on big phases. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might give him more creative liberty. Plus, his past habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public efficiencies.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could suggest he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the probability appears to be moderately high, possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be honest, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres somewhat of a chance that if the victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to cause offense which he really discovered it amusing himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the posts, it points out that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who enjoys consuming, specifically with his group. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would partake in a cheeseburger, particularly if the scenario is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 incredibly bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and thinks anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic information that may affect this prediction.

First, I read through the short articles provided. They all point out the historical statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually turned up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a minor edge, however it's not a big difference.

However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The small historical edge for tails could be due to opportunity. But when making predictions, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I need to think about whether this historic bias needs to influence the possibility.

After thinking of it, I decide that while the historic information reveals a minor preference for tails, it's not statistically substantial enough to move the probability far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the minor historical edge exists but does not override the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would probably believe the exact same. BUT, vetlek.ru its authorities now due to the fact that our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the probability that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty severe accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful calls in recent video games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get irritated when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ridiculous." They say there's no evidence of systematic bias. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're denying it, it may imply there's no genuine basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some reality to it.

Looking at the articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that analytical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have been punished more since 2022. That's interesting since if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate less charges, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't rule out every possibility, however very unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the video game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hi, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.