GitLab

U.S. Diplomacy
Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading online forum for serious discussion of American foreign policy and worldwide affairs. The publication has included contributions from numerous prominent worldwide affairs professionals.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational roles in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-[ai](https://git.corgi.wtf). Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the minute. APSA Cite not available at the minute. APA Cite not available at the minute


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint approvals here.




In the early 1950s, the United States dealt with an important intelligence challenge in its blossoming competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from The second world war might no longer provide sufficient intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. monitoring abilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union's closed airspace. This shortage stimulated an audacious moonshot effort: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were providing vital intelligence, recording images of Soviet rocket installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a comparable juncture. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the worldwide order is intensifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States need to take advantage of its first-rate economic sector and sufficient capacity for development to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence community must harness the country's sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed these days's world. The integration of expert system, especially through big language models, provides groundbreaking opportunities to improve intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the shipment of faster and more pertinent support to decisionmakers. This technological transformation includes considerable downsides, nevertheless, particularly as enemies make use of similar improvements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to protect itself from opponents who might use the technology for ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security neighborhood, fulfilling the promise and handling the danger of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a determination to alter the way companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the capacity of AI while reducing its intrinsic dangers, guaranteeing that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a rapidly evolving global landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, how the nation means to fairly and safely use AI, in compliance with its laws and values.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI's potential to reinvent the intelligence community lies in its capability to procedure and examine vast quantities of information at unprecedented speeds. It can be challenging to examine big amounts of collected data to generate time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services might leverage AI systems' pattern recognition abilities to determine and alert human experts to prospective dangers, such as missile launches or military movements, or essential global developments that analysts know senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This ability would ensure that important cautions are prompt, actionable, and relevant, permitting more efficient responses to both quickly emerging threats and emerging policy chances. Multimodal models, which integrate text, images, and audio, improve this analysis. For example, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence could provide a detailed view of military movements, making it possible for much faster and more accurate hazard evaluations and potentially new means of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence experts can also offload repetitive and time-consuming jobs to devices to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: generating initial and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood's total insights and efficiency. A fine example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence agencies invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has paid off. The capabilities of language models have actually grown progressively advanced and accurate-OpenAI's recently launched o1 and o3 designs demonstrated considerable progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be used to even more quickly equate and sum up text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on greater quantities of non-English information might be efficient in critical subtle differences between dialects and comprehending the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence community could concentrate on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be hard to discover, typically battle to get through the clearance process, and take a long period of time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language products available across the best agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to quicker triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to choose out the needles in the haystack that actually matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be underestimated. Models can swiftly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then confirm and improve, guaranteeing the last items are both detailed and precise. Analysts could team up with an advanced AI assistant to resolve analytical problems, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, enhancing each iteration of their analyses and delivering ended up intelligence faster.

Consider Israel's experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian center and stole about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran's nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and a further 55,000 files stored on CDs, including images and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials put immense pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed assessments of its material and whether it pointed to an ongoing effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these specialists several months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to translate each page, evaluate it by hand for relevant content, and include that details into assessments. With today's AI abilities, wiki.whenparked.com the very first 2 actions in that procedure could have been accomplished within days, perhaps even hours, allowing experts to understand and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.

One of the most intriguing applications is the way AI could change how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, enabling them to engage straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would enable users to ask particular questions and get summed up, pertinent details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make notified choices quickly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses numerous advantages, it also poses considerable new dangers, especially as enemies develop comparable innovations. China's improvements in AI, particularly in computer system vision and surveillance, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian routine, it does not have privacy constraints and civil liberty defenses. That deficit allows large-scale information collection practices that have yielded data sets of immense size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on large amounts of individual and behavioral information that can then be used for numerous functions, such as monitoring and social control. The presence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software worldwide could supply China with ready access to bulk data, notably bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition models, a particular issue in countries with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood need to consider how Chinese models constructed on such comprehensive data sets can offer China a strategic benefit.

And it is not just China. The expansion of "open source" AI models, such as Meta's Llama and those developed by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI capabilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly inexpensive costs. Much of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are utilizing big language designs to quickly produce and spread incorrect and malicious material or to conduct cyberattacks. As witnessed with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals intercept abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, yogaasanas.science and Russia will have every reward to share some of their AI advancements with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, consequently increasing the risk to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community's AI models will end up being attractive targets for enemies. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become vital national properties that must be against adversaries seeking to compromise or manipulate them. The intelligence community need to invest in developing safe AI models and in developing requirements for "red teaming" and constant evaluation to protect against prospective risks. These teams can utilize AI to mimic attacks, discovering prospective weak points and developing methods to reduce them. Proactive steps, including collaboration with allies on and investment in counter-AI innovations, will be necessary.

THE NEW NORMAL

These obstacles can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to totally mature brings its own risks; U.S. intelligence capabilities will fall behind those of China, Russia, and other powers that are going complete steam ahead in establishing AI. To make sure that intelligence-whether time-sensitive warnings or longer-term strategic insight-continues to be an advantage for the United States and its allies, the country's intelligence community needs to adjust and innovate. The intelligence services should quickly master the usage of AI technologies and make AI a foundational aspect in their work. This is the only sure method to guarantee that future U.S. presidents get the finest possible intelligence assistance, remain ahead of their enemies, and secure the United States' sensitive abilities and operations. Implementing these modifications will require a cultural shift within the intelligence community. Today, intelligence analysts mainly construct products from raw intelligence and data, with some assistance from existing AI models for voice and images analysis. Moving on, intelligence officials need to check out consisting of a hybrid technique, in line with existing laws, using AI designs trained on unclassified commercially available information and fine-tuned with classified details. This amalgam of technology and conventional intelligence event could result in an AI entity providing direction to images, wavedream.wiki signals, open source, garagesale.es and measurement systems on the basis of an integrated view of normal and anomalous activity, automated images analysis, and automated voice translation.

To speed up the transition, intelligence leaders need to champion the advantages of AI integration, stressing the improved abilities and effectiveness it provides. The cadre of recently designated chief AI officers has actually been developed in U.S. intelligence and defense to serve as leads within their agencies for promoting AI development and getting rid of barriers to the technology's implementation. Pilot jobs and asteroidsathome.net early wins can develop momentum and confidence in AI's abilities, motivating more comprehensive adoption. These officers can utilize the know-how of nationwide laboratories and utahsyardsale.com other partners to test and improve AI designs, guaranteeing their effectiveness and security. To institutionalize change, leaders should produce other organizational incentives, including promos and training chances, to reward innovative techniques and those workers and systems that demonstrate effective usage of AI.

The White House has created the policy needed for making use of AI in national security agencies. President Joe Biden's 2023 executive order concerning safe, protected, and credible AI detailed the guidance needed to fairly and securely use the innovation, and National Security Memorandum 25, issued in October 2024, is the country's foundational technique for utilizing the power and managing the risks of AI to advance nationwide security. Now, Congress will need to do its part. Appropriations are needed for departments and firms to create the facilities required for innovation and experimentation, conduct and scale pilot activities and assessments, and continue to purchase evaluation capabilities to make sure that the United States is constructing reliable and high-performing AI innovations.

Intelligence and military communities are committed to keeping human beings at the heart of AI-assisted decision-making and have actually produced the frameworks and tools to do so. Agencies will need standards for how their analysts should utilize AI designs to make certain that intelligence products satisfy the intelligence neighborhood's requirements for dependability. The government will likewise need to maintain clear guidance for managing the data of U.S. people when it pertains to the training and usage of large language designs. It will be essential to balance using emerging technologies with safeguarding the personal privacy and civil liberties of people. This implies augmenting oversight systems, updating pertinent structures to show the capabilities and risks of AI, and promoting a culture of AI advancement within the nationwide security device that utilizes the capacity of the innovation while securing the rights and freedoms that are foundational to American society.

Unlike the 1950s, when U.S. intelligence raced to the leading edge of overhead and satellite imagery by establishing numerous of the crucial innovations itself, winning the AI race will need that community to reimagine how it partners with personal industry. The economic sector, which is the main means through which the federal government can understand AI development at scale, is investing billions of dollars in AI-related research study, data centers, and computing power. Given those companies' improvements, intelligence firms must prioritize leveraging commercially available AI models and fine-tuning them with categorized information. This technique makes it possible for the intelligence neighborhood to quickly broaden its abilities without having to go back to square one, permitting it to remain competitive with enemies. A recent cooperation between NASA and IBM to develop the world's biggest geospatial foundation model-and the subsequent release of the model to the AI neighborhood as an open-source project-is an excellent demonstration of how this type of public-private partnership can operate in practice.

As the national security neighborhood integrates AI into its work, it must guarantee the security and resilience of its models. Establishing requirements to deploy generative AI safely is important for maintaining the stability of AI-driven intelligence operations. This is a core focus of the National Security Agency's brand-new AI Security Center and its collaboration with the Department of Commerce's AI Safety Institute.

As the United States faces growing competition to shape the future of the international order, it is urgent that its intelligence agencies and military profit from the nation's innovation and leadership in AI, focusing especially on big language designs, to supply faster and more appropriate details to policymakers. Only then will they gain the speed, breadth, and depth of insight required to browse a more complex, competitive, and content-rich world.