GitLab

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can anticipate the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a little however spirited 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to answer humanity's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years ago, forum.batman.gainedge.org we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less simple to determine. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language model to be better at anticipating the future (and have seen some intriguing improvements - research paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some price quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months earlier so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown territory to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following questions to our AI and determined its response. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these estimates for prop betting at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, but a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her friends and family to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.

Some fans are excited, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially given comments Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I believe the key points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important occasion, the chances and his actions recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, considering all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it seems like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is quite high. ... I also need to think of the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a substantial number but possible given their confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the technique, and the possibility that they'll utilize it a number of times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the posts, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That appears significant due to the fact that it shows he's done it before, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more current posts, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That might mean he's less most likely to attend to Trump this time.

However, he's also included in a feud with Drake, which may give him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a disparagement match from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about including any questionable songs in the performance. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar may feel forced to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements during the halftime show, so there's a threat that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making bold moves on huge phases. He's the first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which may offer him more creative flexibility. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I also remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, demo.qkseo.in weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the probability appears to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Looks like theres rather of a chance that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't mean to cause offense which he actually found it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may suggest he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the posts, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, forum.tinycircuits.com which suggests that he's an individual who delights in eating, specifically with his group. So, if there were plans to after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can happen when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historical data that might affect this prediction.

First, I review the posts supplied. They all mention the historic stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has actually shown up regularly than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has actually been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a big distinction.

However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making predictions, often individuals weigh historical data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I need to consider whether this historic bias must influence the likelihood.

After believing about it, I decide that while the historical information shows a slight choice for tails, it's not statistically substantial adequate to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists however doesn't bypass the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely think the same. BUT, its authorities now since our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of short articles that talk about conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful contact current video games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does seem to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "outrageous." They state there's no evidence of systematic bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may imply there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some reality to it.

Looking at the posts, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise mentioned that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information reveals the Chiefs have actually been punished more since 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect less penalties, right?

...

So, putting all of it together, systemcheck-wiki.de the likelihood that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't rule out every possibility, however exceptionally unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth viewing the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.