Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in
  • N nudem
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Issues 1
    • Issues 1
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Garry Bechtel
  • nudem
  • Issues
  • #1

Closed
Open
Created Feb 09, 2025 by Garry Bechtel@garrybechtel47Maintainer

How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Frightens' Creatives


For Christmas I received an intriguing gift from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was completely written by AI, securityholes.science with a few simple triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and hb9lc.org a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of composing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, oke.zone since pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can purchase any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in any person's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He hopes to widen his range, creating different genres such as sci-fi, and maybe using an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we in fact suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for innovative functions should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective however let's develop it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use developers' content on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, bytes-the-dust.com a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also highly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear promise of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made till we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them accredit their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library including public information from a broad range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits versus AI companies, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can constitute fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure for how long I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking