Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology
A.gov site belongs to a main government company in the United States.
Secure.gov sites utilize HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or wifidb.science https:// suggests you have actually safely linked to the.gov website. Share delicate details just on authorities, protected sites.
- About - The Attorney general of the United States
Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
-
Privacy Program
- Press Releases - Speeches - Videos - Photo Galleries - Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents - Forms - Publications
- Details for Victims in Large Cases - Justice Manual
-
Business and elearnportal.science Contracts
- Why Justice? - Benefits - DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About - News
- Internships
- FOIA
- Contact
- Details for Journalists
- About - title=" About" About - The Attorney General
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News - Press Releases - Speeches - Videos - Photo Galleries - Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources - Guidance Documents - Forms - Publications - Details for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
-
Business and sitiosecuador.com Contracts
- Employment - Why Justice? - Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices - Find Aid
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
- Office of Public Affairs
- News
- Press Releases
- Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National In Relation To Alleged Plan To Steal Proprietary AI Technology
MENU News
- All News - Blogs - Photo Galleries - Podcasts - Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
Archived Press Releases
Archived News
Para Notícias en Español
Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology
- Facebook - X. - LinkedIn.
- Email
Note: View the superseding indictment here.
A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today charging Linwei Ding, likewise known as Leon Ding, akropolistravel.com 38, with 7 counts of economic espionage and 7 counts of theft of trade secrets in connection with an alleged strategy to take from Google LLC (Google) proprietary details connected to AI innovation.
Ding was initially arraigned in March 2024 on 4 counts of theft of trade tricks. The superseding indictment returned today explains seven categories of trade secrets stolen by Ding and charges Ding with seven counts of financial espionage and 7 counts of theft of trade secrets.
According to the superseding indictment, Google worked with Ding as a software engineer in 2019. Between roughly May 2022 and May 2023, Ding published more than 1,000 distinct files containing Google private details from Google's network to his individual Google Cloud account, including the trade secrets alleged in the superseding indictment.
While Ding was employed by Google, he secretly associated himself with two People's Republic of China (PRC)- based technology companies. Around June 2022, Ding remained in conversations to be the Chief Technology Officer for an early-stage technology business based in the PRC. By May 2023, Ding had established his own innovation business focused on AI and artificial intelligence in the PRC and was acting as the company's CEO.
The superseding indictment alleges that Ding planned to benefit the PRC federal government by taking trade secrets from Google. Ding apparently stole technology associating with the hardware infrastructure and software application platform that enables Google's supercomputing data center to train and serve large AI designs. The trade tricks contain detailed details about the architecture and performance of Google's Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) chips and systems and Google's Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems, the software application that enables the chips to interact and perform jobs, and the software that orchestrates thousands of chips into a supercomputer efficient in training and carrying out cutting-edge AI work. The trade tricks likewise pertain to Google's custom-made SmartNIC, a type of network user interface card utilized to enhance Google's GPU, high performance, and cloud networking items.
As declared, Ding flowed a PowerPoint discussion to workers of his innovation business mentioning PRC national policies motivating the development of the domestic AI market. He also created a PowerPoint presentation containing an application to a PRC skill program based in Shanghai. The superseding indictment explains how PRC-sponsored talent programs incentivize people taken part in research and advancement outside the PRC to transmit that knowledge and research to the PRC in exchange for wages, research study funds, lab area, or other incentives. Ding's application for the talent program mentioned that his company's product "will help China to have calculating power infrastructure capabilities that are on par with the worldwide level."
If founded guilty, Ding deals with a maximum penalty of ten years in jail and trademarketclassifieds.com up to a $250,000 fine for each trade-secret count and 15 years in jail and $5,000,000 fine for each economic-espionage count. A federal district court judge will identify any sentence after thinking about the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory elements.
The FBI is examining the case.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Casey Boome and Molly K. Priedeman for the Northern District of California and Trial Attorneys Stephen Marzen and Yifei Zheng of the National Security Division's Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.
Today's action was coordinated through the Justice and Commerce Departments' Disruptive Technology Strike Force. The Disruptive Technology Strike Force is an interagency law enforcement strike force co-led by the Departments of Justice and Commerce developed to target illegal stars, safeguard supply chains, and prevent critical technology from being obtained by authoritarian routines and hostile nation-states.
A superseding indictment is merely a claims. All offenders are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a sensible doubt in a law court.