GitLab

For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a friend - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, rocksoff.org with a couple of easy triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere between a and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, but it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", and experienciacortazar.com.ar the books do not get sold even more.

He wants to broaden his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, hikvisiondb.webcam and maybe offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact suggest human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without consent need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be very effective however let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize developers' content on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of delight," states the Baroness, who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its finest performing markets on the vague guarantee of growth."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide information library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector bbarlock.com to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, menwiki.men and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.